Misleading poll question sets up obvious answer
The local newspaper, the Verde Independent, has been under attack by various member of the Verde Valley Community College Citizen Advocates group for its failure to accurately report on information about Yavapai Community College and for withholding information that shows a disparity between the treatment of residents of the West County and those on the East County. The newspaper has stated that its readers are “becoming a bit burned-out over the `Prescott vs Verde Valley’ dynamic.”
I
In what some may see as retaliation, the newspaper began running a poll asking readers whether the Verde Valley Community College Citizen Advocates should be allowed to ban people from their meetings? This is the result of the group asking one member of the public to leave the meeting who the group believed was not making positive contributions to its mission.
What is left out for obvious reasons was asking a proper question. For example, a proper question would read something like this: “Should an independent, citizens group, not subject to state open meeting requirements, be allowed to bar persons who may publicly attack the group in newspaper editorials, at public gatherings where members are speaking, and or disrupt regularly scheduled group meeting?” Should members of the Rotary, Kiwanis, or YMCA have to tolerate such persons at their meetings? Or welcome them to their meetings after they are publicly attacked and disparaged? Or called names at public meetings such as liars?
That, of course, would have been an honest poll question regarding this particular group. However, the newspaper, as you can see from below, was not interested in that type of question or response to it.

When it became clear there was not majority support for extending the Committee’s life for 24 months, a motion was eventually made to continue the Committee until “such a time that we have enough information from the strategic planning output and then determine whether we disband, discontinue, or whatever.” The Board Chair immediately jumped into the discussion to ask for a vote. The vote was unanimous. This left the Committee hanging precariously out to dry.


You may recall that the Blog’s video reporter was denied access to a meeting held by College president Penelope Wills with NAU and the mayor and Prescott Valley Town Council on March 26. Since that time, Wills’ has been saying that the minutes of the meeting will be publicly available. Finally, they were received by the Blog on June 16.
Larson wrote: “Sadly, the direction Yavapai College has taken in recent years has caused me to agree with a growing number of our community members that it is now time to take control over how our property taxes are utilized.”